Spaces in Paths

A number of readers have recently written me about an error they see when attempting to compile or execute an application or script in books such as, C++ All-In-One for Dummies, 3rd EditionBeginning Programming with Python For Dummies, Python for Data Science for Dummies, and Machine Learning for Dummies. Development environments often handle spaces differently because they’re designed to perform tasks such as compiling applications and running scripts. I had touched on this issue once before in the Source Code Placement post. When you see an error message that tells you that a file or path isn’t found, you need to start looking at the path and determine whether it contains any spaces. The best option is to create a directory to hold your source code and to place that directory off the root directory of your drive if at all possible. Keeping the path small and simple is your best way to avoid potential problems compiling code or running scripts.

The problem for many readers is that the error message is buried inside a whole bunch of nonsensical looking text. The output from your compiler or interpreter can contain all sorts of useful debugging information, such as a complete listing of calls that the compiler, interpreter, or application made. However, unless you know how to read this information, which is often arcane at best, it looks like gobbledygook. Simply keep scanning through the output until you see something that humans can read and understand. More often than not, you see an error message that helps you understand what went wrong, such as not being able to find a file or path. Please let me know if you ever have problems making the code examples in my books work, but also be sure to save yourself some time and effort by reading those error messages. Let me know if you have any thoughts or concerns about spaces in directory paths at


Mac Gatekeeper Error

A number of my books, such as C++ All-In-One for Dummies, 3rd EditionBeginning Programming with Python For Dummies, Python for Data Science for Dummies, and Machine Learning for Dummies ask readers to download an IDE or other code and install it on their Mac systems. The problem is that the Mac system won’t always cooperate. For example, you might see an error dialog like the one shown for Code::Blocks:

The Gatekeeper error tells you that it won't allow you to install software from unknown publishers.
Your Mac won’t let you install software.

The problem is one of permissions. The default permissions set for newer Mac systems restrict you to getting your apps from the Mac App Store or from vendors who have signed their files. Fortunately, you can overcome this problem either temporarily or permanently, depending on how you want to use your Mac. The Fix the “App can’t be opened because it is from an unidentified developer” Error in Mac OS X blog post provides you with illustrated, step-by-step directions to perform the task using either method. Let me know if you encounter any other problems getting your Mac to install the software required to use my books at


Working with Code in e-Books

Most of my technical readers now use e-books instead of paper books. Of course, there is a convenience factor to storing your entire library on a Kindle, even if it’s a software version of the Kindle. Of course, there are all sorts of e-book formats for your desktop system as well. The point is that electronic format makes a lot of sense when dealing with technical books.

However, e-books can cause some interesting problems and I’ve encountered a few with a number of readers now. The most important consideration is that you can’t cut and paste code from an e-book directly into your IDE and expect it to work. There are all sorts of reasons for this exclusion. For example, cutting and pasting may insert special characters into the output stream or the resulting paste may not have white space in the right places. A common problem is that publishers often convert regular single and double quotes into curly quote equivalents. The two kinds of quotes (both single and double) are completely different and the second type definitely won’t compile.

The best option when working with an e-book is to view the code in the e-book, but still get the downloadable source code for the book from the publishers website. I always provide a blog post detailing where to obtain the downloadable source for a book, when you need source code to use the book. If you can’t find the downloadable source, always feel free to contact me at I want to be sure you have a great reading experience, which means having source code that actually runs in your development environment.

Another potential problem with e-books is that you may see unfortunate code breaks (despite the efforts of the publisher and myself). When you need to understand how white space works with a programming language, always review the downloadable source. The fact that the downloadable source compiles and runs tells you that all the of white space is in the right place and of the correct type. Typing the source code directly out of your e-book could result in added carriage returns or other white space errors that will cause the code to fail, even though the commands, variables, and other parts of the code are all correct.

As always, I’m open to your questions about my books. If you don’t understand how things work, please contact me—that’s why I’m here.


Is Security Research Always Useful?

Anyone involved in the computer industry likely spends some amount of time reading about the latest security issues in books such as Security for Web Developers. Administrators and developers probably spend more time than many people, but no one can possibly read all the security research available today. There are so many researchers looking for so many bugs in so many places and in so many different ways that even if someone had the time and inclination to read every security article produced, it would be impossible. You’d need to be the speediest reader on the planet (and then some) to even think about scratching the surface. So, you must contemplate the usefulness of all that research—whether it’s actually useful or simply a method for some people to get their name on a piece of paper.

Some of the attacks require physical access to the system. In some cases, you must actually take the system apart to access components in order to perform the security trick. Unless you or your organization is in the habit of allowing perfect strangers physical access to your systems, which might include taking them apart, you must wonder whether the security issue is even worth worrying about. You need to ask why someone would take the time to document a security issue that’s nearly impossible to see, much less perform in a real world environment. More importantly, the moment you see that a security issue requires physical access to the device, you can probably stop reading.

You also find attacks that require special equipment to perform. The article, How encryption keys could be stolen by your lunch, discusses one such attack. In fact, the article contains a picture of the special equipment that you must build to perpetrate the attack. It places said equipment into a piece of pita bread, which adds a fanciful twist to something that is already quite odd and pretty much unworkable given that you must be within 50 cm (19.6 in) from the device you want to attack (assuming that the RF transmission conditions are perfect). Except for the interesting attack vector (using a piece of pita bread), you really have to question why anyone would ever perpetrate this attack given that social engineering and a wealth of other attacks require no special equipment, are highly successful, and work from a much longer distance.

Another example of incredibly weird security research is found in the article, When the good guys are wielding the lasers. I have to admit it’s interesting in a James Bond sort of way, but we’re talking about lasers mounted on drones. This attack at least has the advantage of distance (1 km or 0.6 mi). However, you have to wonder just how the laser was able to get a line of sight with the attack object, a printer in this case. If a device is critical enough that someone separates it from the Internet, it’s also quite likely that the device won’t be sitting in front of a window where someone can use a laser to access it.

A few research pieces become more reasonable by discussing outlandish sorts of hacks that could potentially happen after an initial break-in. The hack discussed in Design flaw in Intel chips opens door to rootkits is one of these sorts of hacks. You can’t perpetrate the hack until after breaking into the system some other way, but the break-in has serious consequences once it occurs. Even so, most hackers won’t take the time because they already have everything needed—the hack is overkill.

The articles that help most provide a shot of reality into the decidedly conspiracy-oriented world of security. For example, Evil conspiracy? Nope, everyday cyber insecurity, discusses a series of events that everyone initially thought pointed to a major cyber attack. It turns out that the events occurred at the same time by coincidence. The article author thoughtfully points out some of the reasons that the conspiracy theories seemed a bit out of place at the outset anyway.

It also helps to know the true sources of potential security issues. For example, the articles, In the security world, the good guys aren’t always good and 5 reasons why newer hires are the company’s biggest data security risk, point out the sources you really do need to consider when creating a security plan. These are the sorts of articles that should attract your attention because they describe a security issue that you really should think about. Likewise, reading articles such as, Software developers aren’t implementing encryption correctly and 4 fatal problems with PKI help you understand why your security measures may not always work as well as anticipated.

The point is that you encounter a lot of information out there that doesn’t help you make your system any more secure. It may be interesting if you have the time to read it, but the tactics truly aren’t practical and no hacker is going to use them. Critical thinking skills are your best asset when building your security knowledge. Let me know about your take on security research at


Code::Blocks on the Mac

A lot of Mac users have written to complain about the stability of Code::Blocks 8.02 on the Mac. This is the version used for the 2nd Edition of C++ All-in-One for Dummies. My first recommendation is that you obtain a copy of C++ All-In-One for Dummies, 3rd Edition if at all possible. This edition of the book contains additional installation details, updated examples, and all sorts of extras that will make your C++ learning experience so much better. Of course, not everyone will want to make the upgrade, but I stick by previous posts saying that some examples won’t work as well as they might if you use a different version of Code::Blocks than specified in the books. However, I also feel your pain. I personally didn’t experience stability problems with the 8.02 release and I’m sure others didn’t either, but enough people have complained that I feel obliged to discuss the issue in a post.

The Code::Blocks 13.12 version used for the 3rd Edition book is considerably more stable than the 8.02 version used for the 2nd edition book. If you really must continue using the 2nd edition book with your Mac, I suggest that you update to Code::Blocks 13.12 if you find that the 8.02 version causes you problems. If you go this route, please be sure to read the Using Code::Blocks 13.12 with C++ All-in-One for Dummies post. It provides you with information you absolutely must have in order to use the updated version successfully.

I always want to hear your book-specific input at Your input helps me create better books and it also allows me to provide posts like this one that help readers work around potential issues. Thank you for your continued support of my books!


C++ Data Type Usage

The Going Overboard section on page 43 of C++ All-In-One for Dummies, 3rd Edition talks about the problems that can occur when you try to stuff a number that’s too large into a specific data type. The problem with the example shown:

    cout << 8762547892451 * 10 / 2 * 3 + 25 << endl;

is that it doesn’t actually result in an error. C++ accepts the large number by using a data type that can hold it automatically, rather than using a default data type of long as would have happened in the past. It’s nice that C++ automatically fixes ambiguous code for you, but it also means that the example doesn’t work as described in the book. In order to see the example as originally intended, you need to change the code to read:

    long MyLong = 8762547892451 * 10 / 2 * 3 + 25;
    cout << MyLong << endl;

The code will now produce an error, just as described in the book, because the data type isn’t ambiguous any longer. The error message does differ slightly. What you’ll see is an error message of:

warning: overflow in implicit constant conversion [-Woverflow]

Except for having to make the code less ambiguous, the section should continue to work as it did before. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns about this example at


Source Code Placement

I always recommend that you download the source code for my books. The Verifying Your Hand Typed Code post discusses some of the issues that readers encounter when typing code by hand. However, I also understand that many people learn best when they type the code by hand and that’s the point of getting my books—to learn something really interesting (see my principles for creating book source code in the Handling Source Code in Books post). Even if you do need to type the source code in order to learn, having the downloadable source code handy will help you locate errors in your code with greater ease. I won’t usually have time to debug your hand typed code for you.

Depending on your platform, you might encounter a situation the IDE chooses an unfortunate place to put the source code you want to save. For example, on a Windows system it might choose the C:\Program Files folder (or a subdirectory) to the store the file. Microsoft wants to make your computing experience safer, so you don’t actually have rights to this folder for storing your data file. As a result, the IDE will stubbornly refuse the save the files in that folder. Likewise, some IDEs have a problem with folder names that have spaces in them. For example, your C:\Users\<Your Name>\My Documents folder might seem like the perfect place to store your source code files, but the spaces in the path will cause problems for the IDE and it will claim that it can’t find the file, even if it manages to successfully save the file.

My recommendation for fixing these, and other source code placement problems, is to create a folder that you can access and have full rights to work with to store your source code. My books usually make a recommendation for the source code file path, but you can use any path you want. The point is to create a path that’s:

  • Easy to access
  • Allows full rights
  • Lacks spaces in any of the path name elements

As long as you follow these rules, you likely won’t experience problems with your choice of source code location. If you do experience source code placement problems when working with my books, please be sure to let me know at


Security = Scrutiny

There is a myth among administrators and developers that it’s possible to keep a machine free of viruses, adware, Trojans, and other forms of malware simply by disconnecting it from the Internet. I’m showing my age (yet again), but machines were being infected with all sorts of malware long before the Internet became any sort of connectivity solution for any system. At one time it was floppy disks that were the culprit, but all sorts of other avenues of attack present themselves. To dismiss things like evil USB drives that take over systems, even systems not connected to the Internet, is akin to closing your eyes and hoping an opponent doesn’t choose to hit you while you’re not looking. After all, it wouldn’t be fair. However, whoever said that life was fair or that anyone involved in security plays by the rules? If you want to keep your systems free of malware, then you need to be alert and scrutinize them continually.

Let’s look at this issue another way. If you refused to do anything about the burglar rummaging around on the first floor while you listened in your bedroom on the second floor, the police would think you’re pretty odd. More importantly, you’d have a really hard time getting any sort of sympathy or empathy from them. After all, if you just let a burglar take your things while you blithely refuse to acknowledge the burglar’s presence, whose fault is that? (Getting bonked on the back of the head while you are looking is another story.) That’s why you need to monitor your systems, even if they aren’t connected to the Internet. Someone wants to ruin your day and they’re not playing around. Hackers are dead serious about grabbing every bit of usable data on your system and using it to make your life truly terrible. Your misery makes them sublimely happy. Really, take my word for it.

The reason I’m discussing this issue is that I’m still seeing stories like, “Chinese hacker group among first to target networks isolated from Internet.” So, what about all those networks that were hacked before the Internet became a connectivity solution? Hackers have been taking networks down for a considerable time period and it doesn’t take an Internet connection to do it. The story is an interesting one because the technique used demonstrates that hackers don’t have to be particularly good at their profession to break into many networks. It’s also alarming because some of the networks targeted were contractors for the US military.

There is no tool, software, connection method, or secret incantation that can protect your system from determined hackers. I’ve said this in every writing about security. Yes, you can use a number of tools to make it more difficult to get through and to dissuade someone who truly isn’t all that determined. Unfortunately, no matter how high you make the walls of your server fortress, the hacker can always go just a bit further to climb them. Headlines such as “Advanced Attackers go Undetected for a Median of 229 Days; Only One-Third of Organizations Identify Breaches on Their Own” tell me that most organizations could do more to scrutinize their networks. Every writing I read about informed security is that you can’t trust anyone or anything when you’re responsible for security, yet organizations continue to ignore that burglar on the first floor.

There is the question of whether it’s possible to detect and handle every threat. The answer is that it isn’t. Truly gifted hackers will blindside you can cause terrifying damage to your systems every time. Monitoring can mitigate the damage and help you recover more quickly, but the fact is that it’s definitely possible to do better. Let me know your thoughts about security at


C++ Switch Statement Using Strings

Readers sometimes ask me the same question often enough that I feel compelled to provide the answer on my blog so that everyone has the benefit of seeing it. C++ does have a switch statement, but you need to use a numeric value with it as described in my book, C++ All-In-One for Dummies, 3rd Edition (see page 233 for details). A number of C# developers who are also learning to use C++ have asked me about using strings in the switch statement, which is clearly impossible without some fancy programming technique.

Fortunately, I have found a method for implementing switches using strings on CodeGuru. As the author states, it’s not a perfect solution and you may not find it works for you, but it is an ingenious coding technique and you should at least look at it. It’s better than saying the goal isn’t achievable using any means. To get a better idea of the methods other coders have used to overcome this problem, check out online discussions, such as Why switch statement cannot be applied on strings?.

Of course, I’m always on the lookout for other good solutions to reader problems. If you have a solution to this issue of using strings with the C++ switch statement, please contact me at I always want to keep the door open to an even more innovative solutions. In the meantime, keep those e-mails coming!


C++ All-in-One for Dummies, 3rd Edition, Error

It seems to be my week for reporting errors! Just yesterday I reported one in Beginning Programming with Python For Dummies. Today I’m reporting an error in C++ All-In-One for Dummies, 3rd Edition. If you look in Book I Chapter 3 on page 67, you see Listing 3-6. The listing title tells you that this example uses brackets to access an individual character in a string, which is precisely what it does. However, what the example is supposed to do is show you how to create the string in the first place. Look at Listing 3-7 on page 68 and you see an example that performs this task. The two listings are switched. As you go through the book, please use Listing 3-7 first and Listing 3-6 second. I’m sorry about any confusion caused by the error. Please contact me at if you have any questions about this or any other error in the book. I’ll be only too happy to help.